I just finished reading (listening to the audiobook of) "Outliers" by Malcolm Gladwell. All of his books are interesting, and really 'up my alley'. This particular book is about challenging the typical (at least western) intuition about what makes people successful. Certainly in America, there is conventional wisdom that successful people are the smartest and brightest-- that they are talented. And that what made them successful was their own personal effort and achievement. This 'pulled up by the bootstraps' kind of mentality certainly was apparent to me when I was in middle and high school and university.
The purpose of the book is to show that often times, if not all the time, success is much more a product of extraordinary but arbitrary circumstance. This isn't to say that successful people are not partly responsible for their success, but that it is not as large of a factor as one might suspect given our cultural biases.
For example, the book opens with an interesting observation (and I'm getting this stats wrong, but they're really close): if you observe 'successful' hockey players in north america (NHL, etc.) there is an interesting stat: 40% of successful hockey players were born between January and March. Another 40% between March and June; only 10% of 'successful' hockey players were born between October and December! The reason for this is that the age cutoff for league play when you are a child (like 8 y/o) is Jan 1st. Thus, if you were born really close to the first of the year, then you would be held back, and the next year the league you joined would be almost 12 months older than you December bday buddies. When you are 8 y/o 11 or 12 months of development makes a tremendous amount of difference: you are bigger, stronger, more mature. You are able to gain a false sense of confidence because you excel over your 11 and 12 month old team mates. When the scouts come to recruit into the youth competitive leagues, these are the kids much more likely to be recruited. In competitive leagues, you practice 2x as much, and get much higher quality coaching than recreational players. So by the time you enter high school or college-- you really are better and more talented! And this is all due to an arbitrary differentiation based on birthday. This has nothing to do with talent or skill-- but something completely arbitrary. The same can be seen with kids who were held back in school in kindergarten and first grade: they are slightly older, and slightly more mature. This allows them to master the material just a little better, and whats more important is they believe they are smarter, and this belief drives them to be even more academic than their peers who comparatively believe that they 'dont get it' or 'arent smart enough'.
I found a lot of this echoing my own life. I was held back in kindergarten. I was always one of the oldest in the class. I always felt that I was smarter than my peers in grade school, and was usually more well behaved. Now the book doesn't try to claim that these are alone reasons for success-- there are chapters on parenting and cultural legacies as well; but the point is that my birthday being in August and causing me to be held back was a completely arbitrary advantage that I was awarded for no effort of my own. I can see many of these small, coincidental, and arbitrary advantages in my life: I was arrested when I was 15 for making fake IDs for my friends. Its a story for another day, but it forced me to get a job and hang out with different friends. The circumstances that lead to this were very random, and yet this has CERTAINLY contributed to my success. I'm still very young (well old to some of you!), but I do feel like I have accomplished a lot for someone my age, and I am happy with my 'direction' so far. But I have to recognize that so much of this is not my doing, but through wonderful happenstance. It is humbling to recognize this, and that's healthy I think.
One thing I know for sure: when I was arrested or any of the other 'bad' things that happened to me when I was 14-18-- I hated them at the time. I thought I had bad luck, and that they were completely bad things. It was only a few years ago that I realized the amazingly positive impact that they had on my life. So if nothing else, please recognize that the bad things that happen in life may in fact turn out to be pivotal in shaping who you become. We can at least be hopeful that our pain has some merit-- if nothing else the hope itself has some utility.
As much as I complain about some things, I am happy that I am who I am. I have to recognize that both the 'good' and the 'bad' make me 'Steve', and for that I am thankful.
A nice treat for the (probably none) readers that made it this far :-)

Much Love,
Steve





